The democratic legitimation of judicial balancing: analysis of the debate between R. Alexy, J. Habermas and L. Ferrajoli

Michele Zezza

doi:10.4013/rechtd.2021.131.05

The democratic legitimation of judicial balancing: analysis of the debate between R. Alexy, J. Habermas and L. Ferrajoli

Michele Zezza

Universidade de São Paulo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › revisión exhaustiva

Resumen

This work focuses on the problem of the democratic legitimacy of judicial balancing, analysing the theoretical debate between Robert Alexy, Jürgen Habermas and Luigi Ferrajoli. We aim to pinpoint how this issue leads to various solutions depending on different understandings of the distinction between rules and principles, and more in general of the function of the law in today’s constitutional democracies.

Idioma original	Inglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)	51-65
Número de páginas	15
Publicación	Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito
Volumen	13
N.º	1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2021.131.05
Estado	Publicada - ene. 2021
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

Acceder al documento

10.4013/rechtd.2021.131.05

Otros archivos y enlaces

Enlace a la publicación en Scopus

Citar esto

@article{7654d92302c94639aa3fe2609b9f9a78,

title = "The democratic legitimation of judicial balancing: analysis of the debate between R. Alexy, J. Habermas and L. Ferrajoli",

abstract = "This work focuses on the problem of the democratic legitimacy of judicial balancing, analysing the theoretical debate between Robert Alexy, J{\"u}rgen Habermas and Luigi Ferrajoli. We aim to pinpoint how this issue leads to various solutions depending on different understandings of the distinction between rules and principles, and more in general of the function of the law in today{\textquoteright}s constitutional democracies.",

keywords = "Argumentative Representation, Judicial Balancing, Political Autonomy",

author = "Michele Zezza",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

doi = "10.4013/rechtd.2021.131.05",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "51--65",

journal = "Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito",

issn = "2175-2168",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The democratic legitimation of judicial balancing

T2 - analysis of the debate between R. Alexy, J. Habermas and L. Ferrajoli

AU - Zezza, Michele

PY - 2021/1

Y1 - 2021/1

N2 - This work focuses on the problem of the democratic legitimacy of judicial balancing, analysing the theoretical debate between Robert Alexy, Jürgen Habermas and Luigi Ferrajoli. We aim to pinpoint how this issue leads to various solutions depending on different understandings of the distinction between rules and principles, and more in general of the function of the law in today’s constitutional democracies.

AB - This work focuses on the problem of the democratic legitimacy of judicial balancing, analysing the theoretical debate between Robert Alexy, Jürgen Habermas and Luigi Ferrajoli. We aim to pinpoint how this issue leads to various solutions depending on different understandings of the distinction between rules and principles, and more in general of the function of the law in today’s constitutional democracies.

KW - Argumentative Representation

KW - Judicial Balancing

KW - Political Autonomy

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85109883227

U2 - 10.4013/rechtd.2021.131.05

DO - 10.4013/rechtd.2021.131.05

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85109883227

SN - 2175-2168

VL - 13

SP - 51

EP - 65

JO - Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito

JF - Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito

IS - 1

ER -

The democratic legitimation of judicial balancing: analysis of the debate between R. Alexy, J. Habermas and L. Ferrajoli

Resumen

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto