Resumen
The report states the unconstitutionality of article 38 ter of Law No 18.933 based on three main arguments. First, it would violate the legal reserve warrantee and principle of the fundamental rights; hence it makes the regulation of the ISAPRES plan's prices fall under the general guidelines passed by the Superintendence of ISAPRES. Secondly, the risks factor table -established in said article- violates the principle of equality by setting an unjustified differentiation conditional to sex and age. Finally, it affects the freedom of the subscriber to really choose the health system, since the ISAPRE could marginalize the users of the system when fixing prices, hence restricting the real freedom of the choosing.
| Título traducido de la contribución | Report submitted in law constitutional court unconstitutional in the process of article 38 ter of law no 18,933 |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 633-674 |
| Número de páginas | 42 |
| Publicación | Estudios Constitucionales |
| Volumen | 8 |
| N.º | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 2010 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
ODS 3: Salud y bienestar
-
ODS 16: Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
Palabras clave
- Equality principle
- Isapres
- Legal reserve of rights
- Right to health care
- Risk factors table
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Informe en derecho presentado ante el tribunal constitucional en el proceso de inconstitucionalidad del artículo 38 ter de la ley no 18.933'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver