Resumen
The paper reviews the issue of national discretion under the case law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, especially taking into consideration the conventionality control doctrine. First, the text explains the margin of appreciation doctrine and the proportionality principle in the Court's jurisprudence. They are two standards in which it is possible to analyze international deference to national authorities. Second, it describes the conventionality control doctrine, advancing a proposal for its classification that illustrates different levels of national discretion as has been defined by the Inter-American Court. The paper concludes that the different types of the conventionality control doctrine carry different degrees of international deference.
| Título traducido de la contribución | Interamericana de derechos humanos conventionality control, international deference, and national discretion in the inter-American court of human rights case law |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 235-274 |
| Número de páginas | 40 |
| Publicación | Ius et Praxis |
| Volumen | 20 |
| N.º | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 2014 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
ODS 16: Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
Palabras clave
- Conventionality control
- Deference
- Margin of appreciation
- National discretion
- Proportionality principle
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Control de convencionalidad, deferencia internacional y discreción nacional en la jurisprudencia de la corte'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver