Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quenching of galaxies at cosmic noon: Understanding the effect of the environment

  • Akriti Singh
  • , Lucia Guaita
  • , Pascale Hibon
  • , Boris Häußler
  • , Kyoung Soo Lee
  • , Vandana Ramakrishnan
  • , Ankit Kumar
  • , Nelson Padilla
  • , Nicole M. Firestone
  • , Hyunmi Song
  • , Maria Celeste Artale
  • , Ho Seong Hwang
  • , Paulina Troncoso Iribarren
  • , Caryl Gronwall
  • , Eric Gawiser
  • , Julie Nantais
  • , Francisco Valdes
  • , Changbom Park
  • , Yujin Yang
  • European Southern Observatory Santiago
  • Universidad Andres Bello
  • Millennium Nucleus for Galaxies (MINGAL)
  • Purdue University
  • Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental (CONICET-UNC)
  • Rutgers University–New Brunswick
  • Chungnam National University
  • Seoul National University
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Gemini Observatory/NSF's NOIRLab
  • Korea Institute for Advanced Study
  • Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context.We identified and analysed massive quiescent galaxies (MQGs) at z ≈ 3:1 within the 2 deg2 COSMOS field and explored the effect of the galaxy environment on quenching processes. By examining the variation in the quenched fraction and physical properties of these galaxies in different environmental contexts, including local densities, protoclusters, and cosmic filaments, we investigated the connection between environmental factors and galaxy quenching at cosmic noon. Aims. We selected MQGs at z ≈ 3:1 using deep photometric data from the COSMOS2020 catalogue combined with narrow-bandselected Lyman-emitters (LAEs) from the One-hundred-square-degree DECam Imaging in Narrowbands (ODIN) survey. We performed a spectral energy distribution fitting using the code BAGPIPES to derive the star formation histories and quenching timescales. We constructed Voronoi-tessellation density maps using LAEs, and we independently selected galaxies photometrically to characterize the galaxy environments. Methods. We identified 24 MQGs at z ≈ 3:1, each of which has a stellar mass higher than 1010:6 M⊙. These MQGs share remarkably uniform star-formation histories, with intense starburst phases followed by rapid quenching within short timescales (≤400 Myr). The consistency of these quenching timescales suggests a universal and highly e≤cient quenching mechanism in this epoch. We found no significant correlation between environmental density (either local or large scale) and galaxy quenching parameters such as the quenching duration, the quenched fraction, or the timing. MQGs show no preferential distribution with respect to protoclusters or filaments compared to massive star-forming galaxies. Some MQGs reside close to gas-rich filaments, but show no evidence of rejuvenated star formation. This implies gas-heating mechanisms and not gas exhaustion. These results indicate that the quenching processes at z ≈ 3:1 likely depend little on the immediate galaxy environment. Results. Our findings suggest that environmental processes alone, such as galaxy mergers, interactions, or gas stripping, cannot fully explain the galaxy quenching at z ≈ 3:1. Internal mechanisms such as feedback from AGN, stellar feedback, virial shock heating, or morphological quenching instead play an important role in quenching. Future spectroscopic observations must confirm the quiescent nature and precise redshifts of these galaxies. Observational studies of gas dynamics, gas temperature, and ionisation conditions within and around MQGs will also clarify the physical mechanisms driving galaxy quenching during this critical epoch of galaxy evolution.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberA68
JournalAstronomy and Astrophysics
Volume700
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2025

Keywords

  • Galaxies: evolution
  • Galaxies: high-redshift
  • Infrared: galaxies
  • Large-scale structure of Universe

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quenching of galaxies at cosmic noon: Understanding the effect of the environment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this