Abstract
This essay examines how economic rationality contributes to the construction of legal meaning within constitutional discourse. Using a semiotic perspective, it argues that economic concepts operate as signifiers shaping interpretation rather than as external constraints. The research concludes that recognizing this interaction supports an “open semiotics” of law, where constitutional meaning remains dynamic, contested, and continuously produced through interpretive practices.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Open Semiotics |
| Editors | Amir Biglari |
| Place of Publication | Paris |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Volume | V |
| Edition | 1 |
| State | Accepted/In press - Oct 2026 |
Keywords
- Economic constitution
- Intersemiotic translation
- Economic rationality
- Material constitution
- European economic governance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Legal Meaning at the Intersection of Law and Economic Rationality: A Semiotic Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver