Informe en derecho presentado ante el tribunal constitucional en el proceso de inconstitucionalidad del artículo 38 ter de la ley no 18.933

V. Pablo Contreras; P. García Gonzalo; D. Tomás Jordán; R. Álvaro Villanueva

doi:10.4067/s0718-52002010000200019

Informe en derecho presentado ante el tribunal constitucional en el proceso de inconstitucionalidad del artículo 38 ter de la ley no 18.933

Translated title of the contribution: Report submitted in law constitutional court unconstitutional in the process of article 38 ter of law no 18,933

V. Pablo Contreras
, P. García Gonzalo
, D. Tomás Jordán
, R. Álvaro Villanueva

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The report states the unconstitutionality of article 38 ter of Law No 18.933 based on three main arguments. First, it would violate the legal reserve warrantee and principle of the fundamental rights; hence it makes the regulation of the ISAPRES plan's prices fall under the general guidelines passed by the Superintendence of ISAPRES. Secondly, the risks factor table -established in said article- violates the principle of equality by setting an unjustified differentiation conditional to sex and age. Finally, it affects the freedom of the subscriber to really choose the health system, since the ISAPRE could marginalize the users of the system when fixing prices, hence restricting the real freedom of the choosing.

Translated title of the contribution	Report submitted in law constitutional court unconstitutional in the process of article 38 ter of law no 18,933
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	633-674
Number of pages	42
Journal	Estudios Constitucionales
Volume	8
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002010000200019
State	Published - 2010
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Access to Document

10.4067/s0718-52002010000200019

Cite this

@article{02b31413fb0a42a5b210e71793bb8855,

title = "Informe en derecho presentado ante el tribunal constitucional en el proceso de inconstitucionalidad del art{\'i}culo 38 ter de la ley no 18.933",

abstract = "The report states the unconstitutionality of article 38 ter of Law No 18.933 based on three main arguments. First, it would violate the legal reserve warrantee and principle of the fundamental rights; hence it makes the regulation of the ISAPRES plan's prices fall under the general guidelines passed by the Superintendence of ISAPRES. Secondly, the risks factor table -established in said article- violates the principle of equality by setting an unjustified differentiation conditional to sex and age. Finally, it affects the freedom of the subscriber to really choose the health system, since the ISAPRE could marginalize the users of the system when fixing prices, hence restricting the real freedom of the choosing.",

keywords = "Equality principle, Isapres, Legal reserve of rights, Right to health care, Risk factors table",

author = "\{Pablo Contreras\}, V. and \{Garc{\'i}a Gonzalo\}, P. and \{Tom{\'a}s Jord{\'a}n\}, D. and \{{\'A}lvaro Villanueva\}, R.",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.4067/s0718-52002010000200019",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "8",

pages = "633--674",

journal = "Estudios Constitucionales",

issn = "0718-0195",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informe en derecho presentado ante el tribunal constitucional en el proceso de inconstitucionalidad del artículo 38 ter de la ley no 18.933

AU - Pablo Contreras, V.

AU - García Gonzalo, P.

AU - Tomás Jordán, D.

AU - Álvaro Villanueva, R.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The report states the unconstitutionality of article 38 ter of Law No 18.933 based on three main arguments. First, it would violate the legal reserve warrantee and principle of the fundamental rights; hence it makes the regulation of the ISAPRES plan's prices fall under the general guidelines passed by the Superintendence of ISAPRES. Secondly, the risks factor table -established in said article- violates the principle of equality by setting an unjustified differentiation conditional to sex and age. Finally, it affects the freedom of the subscriber to really choose the health system, since the ISAPRE could marginalize the users of the system when fixing prices, hence restricting the real freedom of the choosing.

AB - The report states the unconstitutionality of article 38 ter of Law No 18.933 based on three main arguments. First, it would violate the legal reserve warrantee and principle of the fundamental rights; hence it makes the regulation of the ISAPRES plan's prices fall under the general guidelines passed by the Superintendence of ISAPRES. Secondly, the risks factor table -established in said article- violates the principle of equality by setting an unjustified differentiation conditional to sex and age. Finally, it affects the freedom of the subscriber to really choose the health system, since the ISAPRE could marginalize the users of the system when fixing prices, hence restricting the real freedom of the choosing.

KW - Equality principle

KW - Isapres

KW - Legal reserve of rights

KW - Right to health care

KW - Risk factors table

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78650566792

U2 - 10.4067/s0718-52002010000200019

DO - 10.4067/s0718-52002010000200019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78650566792

SN - 0718-0195

VL - 8

SP - 633

EP - 674

JO - Estudios Constitucionales

JF - Estudios Constitucionales

IS - 2

ER -

Informe en derecho presentado ante el tribunal constitucional en el proceso de inconstitucionalidad del artículo 38 ter de la ley no 18.933

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this