Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Independence and impartiality in military justice systems: Comparative international standards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The article analyzes the international human rights standards applicable to military justice systems, especially in the matter of independence and impartiality of judges. The research de scribes, analyzes and compares the case law and commentaries of international human rights bodies. It focuses on four international and regional human rights subsystems: the Human Rights Committee of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights. From a comparative approach, it is defined three independence and impartiality standards for military courts: the exclusion of civilians from the jurisdictional scope of military justice, the subject matter jurisdiction's restrictions and the determination of independence and impartiality guarantees in the military sphere.

Translated title of the contributionIndependencia e imparcialidad en sistemas de justicia militar: Estándares internacionales comparados
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)X191-248
JournalEstudios Constitucionales
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Human rights
  • Impartiality
  • Independence
  • Military justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Independence and impartiality in military justice systems: Comparative international standards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this