Abstract
Fifty female social scientists donated their testimonies to this book. This chapter’s analysis sheds light on their experiences of gender inequality and violence, personal or witnessed during their graduate training. The narratives collected reveal three major areas of vulnerability. First, the androcentric symbolic mechanisms (experienced in daily interactions inside and outside the classrooms) naturalize a masculine vision of scientific and academic prestige in universities. Second, class discrimination has specific effects on women and is exacerbated by the gender discrimination they suffer. Finally, the chapter identifies mechanisms of racial labeling based on women’s phenotypes and regional and/or national origin. Addressing these aspects will enrich the statistical diagnoses of the phenomenon developed in Chap. 3. It will also help us understand why, despite a greater number of women in social sciences postgraduate courses in Chile (and worldwide) compared to other fields of knowledge, female social scientists still do not experience minimum conditions of equity in their education.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | How to Suppress the Careers of Female Social Scientists - Volume 1 |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Feminist Ethnographic Anti-manual from Chile |
| Publisher | Springer Nature |
| Pages | 211-226 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Volume | 1 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031841323 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783031841316 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Graduate Training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver