Des-contextualización del derecho de acceso a la información pública por la jurisprudencia constitucional chilena. Comentarios a la sentencia del tribunal constitucional rol 7425-19-ina de 19 de diciembre 2019

Lorayne Finol Romero; Emercio Aponte Aponte

doi:10.4067/S0718-52002021000100356

Des-contextualización del derecho de acceso a la información pública por la jurisprudencia constitucional chilena. Comentarios a la sentencia del tribunal constitucional rol 7425-19-ina de 19 de diciembre 2019

Translated title of the contribution: De-contextualization of the right of access to public information by the chilean constitutional jurisprudence comments on the constitutional court's decision, role 7425-19-ina of december 19, 2019

Lorayne Finol Romero
, Emercio Aponte Aponte

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present commentary analyzes a judgment of the Constitutional Court that declared the inapplicability of Articles 5 and 10 of Law 20.285 on access to public information, as well as Article 31 bis of law No. 19.300 on general environmental. This ruling, as detailed in the analysis below, reproduces controversial aspects that create barriers to the effective exercise of the right of access to public information and decontextualizes the principle of transparency of the public function of the InterAmerican human rights standards.

Translated title of the contribution	De-contextualization of the right of access to public information by the chilean constitutional jurisprudence comments on the constitutional court's decision, role 7425-19-ina of december 19, 2019
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	356-372
Number of pages	17
Journal	Estudios Constitucionales
Volume	19
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002021000100356
State	Published - Jul 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Access to Document

10.4067/S0718-52002021000100356

Cite this

@article{1c5dedb6d3ac4006b32230bcef99c5c9,

title = "Des-contextualizaci{\'o}n del derecho de acceso a la informaci{\'o}n p{\'u}blica por la jurisprudencia constitucional chilena. Comentarios a la sentencia del tribunal constitucional rol 7425-19-ina de 19 de diciembre 2019",

abstract = "The present commentary analyzes a judgment of the Constitutional Court that declared the inapplicability of Articles 5 and 10 of Law 20.285 on access to public information, as well as Article 31 bis of law No. 19.300 on general environmental. This ruling, as detailed in the analysis below, reproduces controversial aspects that create barriers to the effective exercise of the right of access to public information and decontextualizes the principle of transparency of the public function of the InterAmerican human rights standards.",

keywords = "InterAmerican Human Rights Law, Right of Access to Public Information, Transparency of the Public Service",

author = "\{Finol Romero\}, Lorayne and \{Aponte Aponte\}, Emercio",

year = "2021",

month = jul,

doi = "10.4067/S0718-52002021000100356",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "19",

pages = "356--372",

journal = "Estudios Constitucionales",

issn = "0718-0195",

number = "1",

}

Des-contextualización del derecho de acceso a la información pública por la jurisprudencia constitucional chilena. Comentarios a la sentencia del tribunal constitucional rol 7425-19-ina de 19 de diciembre 2019. / Finol Romero, Lorayne; Aponte Aponte, Emercio.
In: Estudios Constitucionales, Vol. 19, No. 1, 07.2021, p. 356-372.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Des-contextualización del derecho de acceso a la información pública por la jurisprudencia constitucional chilena. Comentarios a la sentencia del tribunal constitucional rol 7425-19-ina de 19 de diciembre 2019

AU - Finol Romero, Lorayne

AU - Aponte Aponte, Emercio

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - The present commentary analyzes a judgment of the Constitutional Court that declared the inapplicability of Articles 5 and 10 of Law 20.285 on access to public information, as well as Article 31 bis of law No. 19.300 on general environmental. This ruling, as detailed in the analysis below, reproduces controversial aspects that create barriers to the effective exercise of the right of access to public information and decontextualizes the principle of transparency of the public function of the InterAmerican human rights standards.

AB - The present commentary analyzes a judgment of the Constitutional Court that declared the inapplicability of Articles 5 and 10 of Law 20.285 on access to public information, as well as Article 31 bis of law No. 19.300 on general environmental. This ruling, as detailed in the analysis below, reproduces controversial aspects that create barriers to the effective exercise of the right of access to public information and decontextualizes the principle of transparency of the public function of the InterAmerican human rights standards.

KW - InterAmerican Human Rights Law

KW - Right of Access to Public Information

KW - Transparency of the Public Service

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85120823890

U2 - 10.4067/S0718-52002021000100356

DO - 10.4067/S0718-52002021000100356

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85120823890

SN - 0718-0195

VL - 19

SP - 356

EP - 372

JO - Estudios Constitucionales

JF - Estudios Constitucionales

IS - 1

ER -

Des-contextualización del derecho de acceso a la información pública por la jurisprudencia constitucional chilena. Comentarios a la sentencia del tribunal constitucional rol 7425-19-ina de 19 de diciembre 2019

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this