Abstract
The purpose of the article is, based on the recent French experience of the Citizens' Convention on Climate, to identify the challenges that this example of deliberative democracy can meet, as well as the perspectives that they raise, at the political, institutional and normative levels. In this context, the methodological approach combines a political and institutional science approach on the origin and consequences in terms of political representativeness of the Citizens' Convention on Climate, on the one hand, and a normative approach on the other. In both cases, therefore, the challenges and perspectives -political, institutional and normative- of the possible generalization of the Citizens' Conventions or assemblies are questioned. The impact of a temporary convention on constitutional, legislative and regulatory norms leads us to question the scope of citizen consultation in the normative process.
| Translated title of the contribution | Challenges and political, institutional and normative perspectives of the Citizens' Assemblies: An approach based on the example of the Citizen's Climate Convention |
|---|---|
| Original language | French |
| Pages (from-to) | 636-651 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Lotocracy-deliberative democracy-normativity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges and political, institutional and normative perspectives of the Citizens' Assemblies: An approach based on the example of the Citizen's Climate Convention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver