TY - JOUR
T1 - Cosmic CARNage II
T2 - The evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function in observations and galaxy formation models
AU - Asquith, Rachel
AU - Pearce, Frazer R.
AU - Almaini, Omar
AU - Knebe, Alexander
AU - Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta
AU - Benson, Andrew
AU - Blaizot, Jeremy
AU - Carretero, Jorge
AU - Castander, Francisco J.
AU - Cattaneo, Andrea
AU - Cora, Sofía A.
AU - Croton, Darren J.
AU - Devriendt, Julien E.
AU - Fontanot, Fabio
AU - Gargiulo, Ignacio D.
AU - Hartley, Will
AU - Henriques, Bruno
AU - Lee, Jaehyun
AU - Mamon, Gary A.
AU - Onions, Julian
AU - Padilla, Nelson D.
AU - Power, Chris
AU - Srisawat, Chaichalit
AU - Stevens, Adam R.H.
AU - Thomas, Peter A.
AU - Vega-Martínez, Cristian A.
AU - Yi, Sukyoung K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - We present a comparison of the observed evolving galaxy stellar mass functions with the predictions of eight semi-analytic models and one halo occupation distribution model. While most models are able to fit the data at low redshift, some of them struggle to simultaneously fit observations at high redshift. We separate the galaxies into 'passive' and 'star-forming' classes and find that several of the models produce too many low-mass star-forming galaxies at high redshift compared to observations, in some cases by nearly a factor of 10 in the redshift range 2.5 < z < 3.0.We also find important differences in the implied mass of the dark matter haloes the galaxies inhabit, by comparing with halo masses inferred from observations. Galaxies at high redshift in the models are in lower mass haloes than suggested by observations, and the star formation efficiency in low-mass haloes is higher than observed. We conclude that many of the models require a physical prescription that acts to dissociate the growth of low-mass galaxies from the growth of their dark matter haloes at high redshift.
AB - We present a comparison of the observed evolving galaxy stellar mass functions with the predictions of eight semi-analytic models and one halo occupation distribution model. While most models are able to fit the data at low redshift, some of them struggle to simultaneously fit observations at high redshift. We separate the galaxies into 'passive' and 'star-forming' classes and find that several of the models produce too many low-mass star-forming galaxies at high redshift compared to observations, in some cases by nearly a factor of 10 in the redshift range 2.5 < z < 3.0.We also find important differences in the implied mass of the dark matter haloes the galaxies inhabit, by comparing with halo masses inferred from observations. Galaxies at high redshift in the models are in lower mass haloes than suggested by observations, and the star formation efficiency in low-mass haloes is higher than observed. We conclude that many of the models require a physical prescription that acts to dissociate the growth of low-mass galaxies from the growth of their dark matter haloes at high redshift.
KW - Cosmology:theory
KW - Dark matter
KW - Galaxies: evolution
KW - Galaxies:haloes
KW - Methods:numerical
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85055275455
U2 - 10.1093/MNRAS/STY1870
DO - 10.1093/MNRAS/STY1870
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85055275455
SN - 0035-8711
VL - 480
SP - 1197
EP - 1210
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 1
ER -