Abstract
The paper reviews the issue of national discretion under the case law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, especially taking into consideration the conventionality control doctrine. First, the text explains the margin of appreciation doctrine and the proportionality principle in the Court's jurisprudence. They are two standards in which it is possible to analyze international deference to national authorities. Second, it describes the conventionality control doctrine, advancing a proposal for its classification that illustrates different levels of national discretion as has been defined by the Inter-American Court. The paper concludes that the different types of the conventionality control doctrine carry different degrees of international deference.
| Translated title of the contribution | Interamericana de derechos humanos conventionality control, international deference, and national discretion in the inter-American court of human rights case law |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 235-274 |
| Number of pages | 40 |
| Journal | Ius et Praxis |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Interamericana de derechos humanos conventionality control, international deference, and national discretion in the inter-American court of human rights case law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver