Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Child sexual abuse interpretation as a sign-construction process

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This is a reflection on Tine Jensen's article 'The Interpretation of Signs of Child Sexual Abuse' (2005) and Robert Innis's considerations 'The Sign of Interpretation' (2005). The article considers first the theoretical consequences of temporality as irreversible flow in meaning making and its relative stability as a narrative. Second, it focuses on ambiguity in sign processing when constructing meaning, arguing that ambiguity is always present in various ways as intrapersonal and interpersonal elaboration and as an essential quality of the elaboration of signs by individuals. Third, it considers signs given by abused children and the complexity of interpretation by others. Finally, the article offers a cultural and dialogical frame for interpretation from Marková's triad model to the phenomena of sexual abuse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-38
Number of pages10
JournalCulture and Psychology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Ambiguity
  • Caregivers
  • Child sexual abuse
  • Meaning making
  • Signs
  • Temporality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Child sexual abuse interpretation as a sign-construction process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this