Abstract
The article begins with a brief outline of the main current theories on the role of punishment, recognizing both the dominance of special prevention as the primary function of criminal law enforcement, and the boom experienced by modern expressive-retributive theories, and its relationship with a positive general prevention theory as the one held by Jakobs. Then, the possibility to explain the treatment given to the different cases of criminal reiteration from the purposes posited by the different theories of punishment is analyzed. Thus, five cases of criminal reiteration are distinguished and the distinctive quality of each is determined: the apparent concurrency (including specialty cases, subsidiarity and consumption), the continuing offense, the real concurrence, recidivism and ideal concurrence. This allows analyzing the treatment that each theory of punishment should grant to every criminal reiteration case in order to support the central role attributed to criminal punishment.
| Translated title of the contribution | Approach to criminal and bankruptcy reiteration theory from the theory of it An approach to criminal reiteration and to concurrence from theory theory of punishment |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 500-543 |
| Number of pages | 44 |
| Journal | Politica Criminal |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 16 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Approach to criminal and bankruptcy reiteration theory from the theory of it An approach to criminal reiteration and to concurrence from theory theory of punishment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver